Work record / Stories

Appealing a fire code rule instead of touching the building

A 1971 garage ran past the fire-access limit, so we appealed the rule instead of altering the structure.

The underground parking garage of the 1971 building is longer than the fire code permits for truck access. Its structural columns on the parking deck also leave too little room for the turning radius trucks need. The direct fix would be to alter structural columns in a concrete structure that is fifty-five years old. I judged that not feasible.

We skipped redesigning the garage or the access and filed a technical code appeal asking that the required access distance be extended. It rested on three facts holding together: a sprinkler system already being modernized, genuine fire protection reachable from two adjacent streets, and a use that is not the high-occupancy kind needing the tighter standard. The appeal asked the code to bend toward what is true on the ground.

We filed in December 2025. After that it sat unread inside our own files for months, until an audit found it had already been filed and fixed the stale belief that it still awaited a signature. As of the latest files I have seen, the Fire Marshal has not yet decided. That was a tracking gap in the paperwork and not anyone's real failure, and it was caught and corrected before it could compound.

Sometimes the right fix for an old building is leaving the building alone. You argue for why the rule should flex around what is true about it.

Story details

All stories · Work record